READING MATERIAL
Sample Socratic Dialogue
"Terrorist or Freedom Fighter"
The following is the beginning of a fictional Socratic Dialogue …
Mark: Sue, I don’t think there can be an argument about a definition. Everyone has their own opinion and who is to say whose opinion is right?
Sue: Mark, do you think everyone’s opinion is just as good as everyone else’s opinion?
Mark: Yes- who are we to decide whose is better?
Tina: Why are you guys always asking questions? Why can’t you just leave the class and let it go!
Professor: Tina, what prompted you to ask that question?
Tina: I just don’t understand the point.
Professor: Why don’t you just let them have their discussion and go on your own way? I mean, is there a reason you want to know why they feel the desire to continue the discussion?
Tina: I will be on my way- I have a class. But I am a little curious as to why seemingly rational people have to argue over things that don’t seem important.
Professor: How would we be able to discern the importance of their topic?
Tina: I just don’t think it is important- that’s all.
Professor: And according to which criteria do you judge their topic to have no importance?
Tina: I’m sorry I said anything! I just want to go to my next class!
Professor: And is that important? …
Works from Carl N. Colavito
Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Florida
“Educating for Democracy:Lessons from Goethe's Faust”
Master’s Thesis, The University of Florida
“How the Modular Nature of the Human Brain Accounts for the Differences in Rationalities which are Used to Justify a Political Order: A Look at Jurgen Habermas'Justificatory Levels”